PR vs. Advertising: Barking up the Wrong Tree

| No TrackBacks

Again, from the Economist:

"...PR is surprisingly effective, at least according to a recent study by Procter & Gamble, the world's biggest consumer-products group. P&G is a firm that marketers pay a lot of attention to, not least because of its advertising budget of some $4 billion. It has always been at the cutting-edge of marketing—P&G is credited with inventing the television soap opera as a new way to sell goods. But with fewer people watching television and the circulation of many papers and magazines declining, the firm has become pickier about where it spends its advertising budget. Increasingly, it wants a measurable return on investment from its campaigns."

Read it in the news >>

My point- at least PR is trying to tell a story.

So how does advertising fight back? With knowledge and entertainment, and yes, branded-experiences. Problem is most agencies are too stupid. Maybe it's the stupidity of the clients.

Both PR and Ad agencies are inauthentic. Why do you want to hear propaganda and lies all day long? Give us truth, knowledge, insight, and a little bit of humor. Talk, don't preach. Get a conversation going. And don't talk about your products unless I ask you a question.

Of course, I'm talking about double loop marketing.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.christiansarkar.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/257

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Christian Sarkar published on January 20, 2006 3:26 AM.

Stupidity 101: Newspapers and Freebies was the previous entry in this blog.

Trust: Mad Cows & Japan is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.